This is a companion post to The A-Spectrum and Homophobia.
But I digress. I've seen so much aro/ace spectrum discourse on solidarity and inclusion for all aces and aros, but most of that appears to center around making hetero, cisgender, abled, white, dyadic people comfortable while further alienating and marginalizing the rest of us.
As a nonbinary gay aro, do I not deserve prioritization? Are my needs less important to the aro community than those of a cisgender, heterosexual aro? Why am I expected to have solidarity with my oppressors even as they rail against my very existence?
Non-LGBQ aros and aces*, here's what you need to do if you really care about ALL aros and aces.
- Don't, unless the person you're referring to has specifically given you permission to do so when referring to them, use the word 'homosexual.' Ever.
This word was coined by Karl-Maria Kertbeny, whose work was used by the Nazis to condone and facilitate the genocide of LGBT people during the Holocaust, and was also later used as a diagnosis of mental illness, so there's definitely ableism tied into it as well.
Personally, the word makes me incredibly uncomfortable because it brings back painful memories of fundamentalist Christians and how they taught me to hate myself. It took me months to fully accept that I didn't deserve what they'd done to me. I'm still working to unlearn my self-hate.
Say 'gay'. If you're talking specifically about non-ace gay people, say 'non-ace gay people'.
2. Some of us are uncomfortable with the words 'allosexual' and 'alloromantic.' Accept it.
I've used the words 'allosexual' and 'alloromantic' occasionally, but I also haven't in a long time. I can understand why many LGBQ people find them offensive, especially with the 'allosexual privilege' side of the ace community screaming about Teh Evil Allogays and how we just have, like, fucking buckets of privilege. Why, we're practically cishets!
There is literally no reason you can't just say 'non-ace' or 'non-aro.' It's not that hard, I promise.
3. Aphobia isn't the new homophobia. Stop co-opting our struggles.
I'm saying this because of a post I found that said 'asexuals/aromantics in the present are slowly being treated like homosexuals in the past.'
I shit you not. Someone actually turned on their computer, logged onto Tumblr dot com, wrote that, and sent it out into cyberspace.
Wow.
The thing is, LGBQ people are still experiencing medicalization, conversion therapy, corrective rape, and social ostracization. We're still at increased risk for mental illness, homelessness, and physical violence. The new homophobia isn't aphobia.
The new homophobia is homophobia, and by even implying otherwise, the ace community (because this was written by an asexual and I've seen other aces state that asexuality is some ~*~edgy~*~ form of queerness which is systematically oppressed by even LGBQ trauma survivors) not only ostracizes those evil allomonosexual gays its more sex-negative members love to hate, but gay and BPQ aces as well.
Aphobia is violent, systematic, and anti-radical to its core...but the way to combat it is not homophobia.
4. Get the fuck over whatever your problem is with lesbians.
Again, this was inspired by a Tumblr post:
"Lesbians cry lesbophobia when their sexuality is being questioned and they’re being pressured into fucking men, but bully asexuals who complain about having their sexuality questioned and pressured into fucking anyone, specifically men."
This person is not only tone policing lesbians on compulsory heterosexuality, but silencing them for speaking about having been correctively raped. How much of a disgusting, rape apologist human being do you have to be to see why that's wrong? How much do you have to hate ace lesbians and lesbian rape survivors, and lesbians in general? How much of a misogynistic piece of shit do you have to be? HOW MUCH?!
Look, I used to be a pretty bad lesbophobe myself, and although I never went this far, I still remember the stereotypes I held. A lot of it came from the fact that the majority of the biphobia and a good chunk of the transphobia directed at me came from lesbians and I was hostile toward them because I perceived all lesbians as a potential threat - as if there weren't nonbinary and trans lesbians who weren't affected by cis lesbians' transphobia as much as I was (and, in the case of trans lesbians, even more than I was). I viewed lesbians as hostile, selfish, toxic, and violent - essentially the same way straight women do. I was almost as bad as our mutual oppressors.
The person who made this post and everyone else who thinks like them - you are almost as bad as our mutual oppressors.
Stay away from me until you can learn to act like a not-shit human being.
5. Don't call non-ace and non-aro people soulless, even as a joke - it's not any less disgusting just because you laugh while doing it.
I've actually seen an asexual do this, and here's why it's offensive.
6. If you're not attracted to your same gender, you don't get to decide what is and is not homophobic.
End of story.
7. Yes, you can be gay, bi, pan, etc., and asexual. At the same time.
Saying that gay aces - because that seems to be who is targeted most often, especially lesbians, but any BPQ aces are free to correct me if I'm wrong - are actually not gay but homoromantic asexuals hypersexualizes gay people and reduces our identity to sex.
As much as the constant "It's not about sex!" (and the consequent implications that it's somehow a bad thing if a gay person's identity is about sex and that sex between two people who are perceived to be the same gender is less acceptable than sex between a cis man and cis woman) roar from the assimilationist portion of the LGB community pisses me off and marginalizes me as a gay aro, I'm also angry that my gay identity isn't seen as up for debate specifically because I want to have sex with women. That's oppressive to me because it essentially reduces my identity to a sensationalist secret or a genre of porn for straight men's pleasure, and to gay aces because it invalidates their identity based on their lack of desire for sex.
8. Say that aro/ace people are 'the most hated members of the LGBT community'.
First of all, I've already made my stance on aro/ace people and belonging in the LGBT+ community perfectly clear (though I do think we need to keep aromanticism and asexuality in the community until our own movement gains some ground). That, however, is beside the point and not all aros and aces (including gay, BPQ, nonbinary, and trans aros and aces) agree with me on it anyway.
Second, did you forget that intersex, nonbinary, and trans people exist? Did you forget that this shit is generally not said by gay aro/ace people, who by the way fucking exist and deserve to be acknowledged, and that many of us hate it with a fiery passion? Did you notice that the people who say it are, half the time, not bi and yet for some odd reason feel the need to drag bi people into it anyway (even though many bi people feel uncomfortable with it)?
9. Do you, as a non-LGBQ aro or ace, feel attacked by this post?
Picture me scrambling around frantically, obviously searching for something.
I'm looking for a fuck, but it seems I don't have a single one to give.
If you feel attacked by this post, that's on you. You, non-LGBQ aces and aros, need to do better and truly make our communities safer for all aces and aros.
*No one should be homophobic, regardless of their identity, but it's a problem that I've noticed is prevalent in the aro and ace communities.
Hi, I'm Dove. I'm biromantic homosexual questioning her gender identity and still not sure about sexuality, but pretty sure. (she/her pronouns). Your posts are really awesome. I ran into one of you on the nanowrimo site (I go by pir2h over there) before I realized I wasn't straight. Your blog is amazing and I was wondering, since I'm kinda half ace and half allo - romantic to everyone, but only sexual to girls/femininity, am I ace or allo? On the ace spectrum? Half? Gray-ace? No need to reply. I'm kinda trying to figure this out.
ReplyDeleteNo, it doesn't make you aro or ace because those identities encompass lack of attraction, weak attraction, lack of desire to act on attraction, or inability to differentiate attraction regardless of gender. (though you can be grayromantic or graysexual and be only attracted to one gender when you DO feel attraction. I'm aroflux and have only ever had crushes on other girls.)
ReplyDeleteThe general term for people whose sexual and romantic orientation that don't match up - ranging from biromantic homosexual, homoromantic heterosexual, heteroromantic pansexual, panromantic asexual, aromantic polysexual, etc. - is varioriented.
Thank you so much for replying. I wish there was some Magic Objective Sorting Hat which told everyone their sexuality/gender/romantic attraction at birth.. :D Just trying to figure this ouT!
ReplyDeleteHaha yeah, I've questioned my sexuality about fifty times in the last two years. You could also identify as sapphic or qu**r (if you're comfortable doing so).
DeleteWhat does sapphic mean? You guys have used it a lot and I've never seen a definition. I'm comfortable with queer, if I'm feeling too lazy to explain... if I had anyone to explain too... (I'm closeted)
DeleteSapphic comes from the Greek poet Sappho, who was either lesbian or bisexual (she did have relationships with men, but she could also have been dealing with compulsory heterosexuality and/or hypersexuality, which are both reasons so many lesbians have been with men). Sometime in the 20th century, lesbians and bi women started using sapphic to describe their sexualities. Now, it's an antiquated term for women who love women that younger lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, and queer-identified feminists are trying to bring back into style.
DeleteBasically, if you're a woman or woman-aligned nonbinary person who is attracted to women, sexually, romantically, or both, you can identify as sapphic.